For years, the most expensive number in restaurant tech was $0. Now federal regulators want a judge to look at the math.
The TL;DR
On October 29, 2026, the FTC, seven state attorneys general, and two California local offices sued one of the largest restaurant POS companies over alleged hidden fees, unauthorized charges, and hard-to-cancel subscriptions.
The complaint targets “$0” hardware claims, a $150-per-remaining-month early termination fee, $85 monthly charges while restaurants were closed, and a $0.99 fee added to diners’ online orders.
It isn’t an isolated case. Small businesses are also suing payment processors directly over recurring “compliance” and “other” fees.
The common thread is fees that appear after the signature. Before you sign, get the termination fee in dollars, the cancellation process in writing, and every recurring charge explained by name.
The Line Item Nobody Remembers Agreeing To
It’s 2:40 on a Tuesday, the dead zone between lunch and dinner. The dough is balled, the make line is restocked, and the owner finally sits down with last month’s processing statement. Somewhere between the batch totals and the card mix sits a line called “Other Fees.” Nobody remembers agreeing to it. Nobody on the support line can explain it. It has, however, been there every month since spring.
For most of the last decade, that line item was a private annoyance. Operators grumbled, paid it, and went back to work. In 2026, it became a federal case.
What Happened: Regulators Took a POS Giant to Court
On October 29, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission sued a publicly traded restaurant POS company in federal court in Northern California. This isn’t a fringe player. By its own count, nearly 200,000 business locations run on its platform.
The FTC didn’t file alone. The attorneys general of Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Utah joined the case, along with the State of California through the Los Angeles County Counsel and the San Francisco City Attorney. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA), and state consumer protection laws. The director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection put it plainly: “These practices are illegal.”
The company says it “strongly disagrees” with the allegations and will fight the case in court. Nothing has been proven, and a judge will decide who’s right. But the complaint lays out the fees in plain numbers, and every restaurant owner should read that list.
The Fees at the Center of the Case
Here’s what the FTC and its co-plaintiffs allege restaurants and their customers were charged:
| Alleged Practice | What the Complaint Says |
|---|
| “$0” hardware and software | Advertised at $0 per month on a pay-as-you-go plan, with costs recovered through higher per-transaction fees. The complaint alleges none of the hardware was actually $0. |
| Hardware clawback | If a restaurant didn’t start processing payments within 120 days, it had to return all hardware or pay full retail value. |
| Charges while closed | Restaurants that closed temporarily still paid $85 a month for payment processing. |
| Early termination fee | $150 for every month remaining on the contract, allegedly undisclosed at enrollment. |
| Add-ons nobody ordered | Timekeeping, payroll, and payroll tax filing allegedly added and billed without consent, on subscriptions that auto-renewed. |
| A fee on your diners | From September 2021 to July 2023, $0.99 was added to online orders over $10, folded into the “Taxes & Fees” line. It went to the POS company, not the restaurant. |
*Allegations from the FTC’s complaint and press release. The company denies them, and none have been decided in court.
“Free” hardware works a lot like a free puppy. The adoption costs nothing. Everything after that is a line item.
The $0.99 fee deserves its own moment. Your customer paid it. Your restaurant’s name was on the order. None of the money came to you. That’s a rare business arrangement: you take the blame and someone else takes the dollar.
$5,318.87
The early termination fee one customer was charged after cancelling, following four years of service, according to the FTC. The company refused to refund it.
The Exit Was Part of the Product
Signing up took minutes. According to the complaint, leaving took a process:
- A written notice of “intent not to renew,” delivered at least 30 days before the term ended. The FTC says this wasn’t clearly disclosed at enrollment.
- A call to customer care, where the complaint says customers met questions and sales pitches.
- A transfer to a non-public cancellation line that kept weekday business hours, Eastern time.
- A deactivation form, completed over the phone.
- Back-office processing. Some customers who followed the rules got no response and were billed again anyway.
Payroll customers allegedly needed 90 days’ notice. Owners with a business loan through the same company faced a harder wall: switching POS providers counted as a default, which made the full balance due at once.
Meanwhile, the company advertised “24/7/365” support. The FTC says one owner who called on a Saturday was told nobody who could help worked weekends, a gap that cost thousands of dollars in card transactions. A cancellation line on banker’s hours and a support line that takes weekends off. If you’ve ever tried to quit a gym, the format will feel familiar.
When it takes five steps and a sales pitch to leave, the exit is part of the pricing.
A POS you choose because it’s better, not because leaving is hard.
Adora runs on the hardware you choose, works with the processor you choose, and comes with U.S.-based support that actually answers 24/7/365.
Schedule a Demo →
It’s Not Just One Company
The federal case is the loudest, but it isn’t alone. In 2026, a group of dental practices and other small businesses in North Carolina filed a proposed class action against their payment processor. The complaint targets monthly recurring fees labeled “PCI DSS Compliance,” “Non-PCI Charge,” “Safe-T SMB Fee,” and “Other Fees,” which together ran almost $100 a month.
How were the fees disclosed? Allegedly in small print, in a section of the monthly statement titled “News for You.” Technically, it was news.
The plaintiffs claim the notices never amounted to a valid contract change. They’re suing under North Carolina’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, along with breach of contract and unjust enrichment. As attorneys at Venable noted, what’s new isn’t the fees. Merchants have fought processor charges for years. What’s new is the “junk fee” label, borrowed from the consumer pricing fights over concert tickets and hotel resort fees, and now aimed at what vendors charge their business customers.
The legal mood has shifted. Regulators and plaintiffs’ lawyers are starting to treat a pizzeria owner signing a POS agreement the way they treat a consumer signing up for a streaming service.
Why This Is Happening Now
Two forces met in the middle.
The first is a business model. A lot of restaurant tech is sold with little or nothing upfront: discounted terminals, free software tiers, setup on the house. That money has to come back somewhere. Usually it comes back through processing markups, subscriptions, add-ons, and the cost of leaving. None of that is illegal on its own. It gets a vendor in trouble when the restaurant can’t see it at the moment it signs.
The second is the law catching up. ROSCA was written to protect people from online subscriptions they can’t cancel. The FTC is now applying it to merchant agreements between businesses. The company being sued argues that “no court has held that ROSCA applies to negotiated business-to-business agreements.” That’s the question the case will answer.
If the FTC wins, every vendor with an auto-renewing merchant agreement will be rereading its enrollment flow. If it loses, the fees don’t get any smaller. They just get harder to fight. Either way, the burden lands on the operator to read closely before signing.
How to Spot Hidden Fees in Your POS Contract
You don’t need a lawyer to run this check, though it never hurts to have one. You need your agreement, your last three statements, and twenty quiet minutes.
- Find out what “$0” covers. Which terminals, for how long, and what happens to the hardware if you leave?
- Get the termination fee in dollars. “$150 times remaining months” is a dollar figure waiting to happen. Have the rep do the math for month one and month 24.
- Learn the cancellation process now. Find the notice window and the method. If it calls for written notice 30 or 90 days out, put the date on your calendar the day you sign.
- Name every recurring charge. Anything called “compliance,” “non-compliance,” “service,” or “other” should come with a one-sentence explanation.
- Audit your add-ons. Payroll, timekeeping, marketing, loyalty. Confirm you opted into each one.
- Check what your customers pay. Place a test online order and read every fee line before you hit submit.
- Untangle your financing. If switching POS providers triggers a loan default, your loan is a lock.
- Test the support promise. Call at 8 on a Saturday night. See who answers.
Shopping for a new system? Here are 12 questions to ask before switching pizza POS, and a closer look at how hardware and payment lock-in raise your costs.
Where Adora Stands
Adora POS was built by pizza people, for pizza people, and it’s built around operator control. It’s hardware-agnostic, running on Windows terminals, tablets, iPads, and most standard devices, so your hardware isn’t a hostage. It’s payment-processor-agnostic, so you pick the processor and negotiate your own rate. And when we say 24/7/365, someone picks up on Saturday:
- U.S.-based support that’s never outsourced
- An average wait of about one minute
- A 96% one-touch ticket resolution rate
- Support included in every contract, with no per-call fees
Bring the checklist above to your demo. Ask us every question on it. We’d rather earn your renewal than engineer it.
Ready to see a POS with nothing hiding in the fine print? Schedule your Adora demo.
Sources & Data
Filing date, co-plaintiffs, alleged fees ($0 pricing, 120-day hardware return, $85 monthly charge while closed, $150 per remaining month early termination fee, $5,318.87 example, $0.99 online order fee), cancellation process, loan default terms, support claims, and the Bureau of Consumer Protection director’s statement: Federal Trade Commission press release, October 29, 2026. Additional complaint detail and the company’s response: PMQ Pizza Magazine. North Carolina merchant class action and the “junk fee” analysis: Venable LLP, All About Advertising Law, August 5, 2026. Adora support availability, average wait, and one-touch ticket resolution rate: Adora POS internal support data. All lawsuit claims described here are allegations that have not been decided in court. This article is not legal advice.